Preparing for launch
Use an Evaluation Assessment to establish an independent baseline, find the failures that matter and agree what must be fixed before customer rollout.
Explore serviceTEST & TRUST AI AGENTS
Choose a focused assessment, an implementation engagement or recurring evaluations. Start with the business decision you need to make, and we will match the evidence to it.
Use an Evaluation Assessment to establish an independent baseline, find the failures that matter and agree what must be fixed before customer rollout.
Explore serviceUse Evaluation Implementation to create repeatable comparisons and release checks your team can run on every change.
Explore serviceUse Managed Evaluations to run scheduled benchmarks, review approved samples of real interactions and track quality over time.
Explore serviceHallucinations erode trust faster than any other agent failure. Every engagement measures them explicitly, by workflow and type.
We test for invented policies, fabricated tool arguments and claimed actions that never happened, not only factual errors.
See how we build source-anchored tests, verify claims and actions, and measure which fixes reduce hallucinations.
Explore serviceA bounded engagement on one agent or workflow. Output: baseline scorecard, prioritized findings, decision workshop and the reviewed dataset. Best when a specific launch or change decision is pending.
Hands-on build of your evaluation harness, datasets, judges and release gates. Output: a working, documented system your engineers own. Best when evaluation must become routine.
Recurring regression runs, sample reviews and monthly reporting at an agreed cadence. Output: ongoing evidence and a growing benchmark. Best when change is constant and in-house capacity is limited.
Task completion, tool selection, argument accuracy, sequencing, handoffs, memory behavior and the final state of the systems the agent touches.
Invented facts, policies and citations; claims unsupported by your sources; correctness, relevance, instruction adherence and consistency with your business rules.
Latency, model usage, retries and cost per successful task within the agreed test scope, so quality gains can be weighed against cost.
Order changes, refunds, bookings, account questions and escalation to people. We test outcomes, policy adherence and the handoff experience.
Agents that read and update CRMs, ticketing, scheduling or finance systems. We check every action against the expected record changes.
Retrieval-based assistants that answer from your documents and then act. We test grounding, citations, omissions and the action that follows the answer.
Orchestrators and specialist agents passing work between them. We test routing, handoff context, duplicated or dropped work and final outcome.
Research, drafting, analysis and data agents used by employees. We test accuracy, completeness and where human review must stay in the loop.
First-contact agents that classify intent and collect information. We test understanding, clarifying questions and correct routing under messy input.
Agree the workflow, users, tools, decision, acceptance criteria, inputs and exclusions in a short written plan before any testing begins.
Build and review the dataset, calibrate evaluators with your experts, run the tests with recorded configuration and investigate every material failure.
Present findings by severity, agree owners and retests, and transfer the dataset, rubrics and instructions your team needs to repeat the work.
Start with one workflow, clear success criteria, and an evaluation plan your team can use.